Matyas Fuele vs Gergely Madarasz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Aug at 12:58 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Fuele vs G. Madarasz

HUN
1
Win
Played
1
Win

HUN
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Fuele 1 - 1 Madarasz
They have played 4 sets in total, with Matyas Fuele winning 2 and Gergely Madarasz winning 2. The last match between Matyas Fuele and Gergely Madarasz was at the M15 Budapest, 26-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Matyas Fuele getting the victory 5-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fuele | 1 |
| Madarasz | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Budapest(08-26-25)
(QF) M25 Poprad(07-01-22)
M. Fuele vs G. Madarasz H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 62.34% (144-87) | Career Total W/L | 61.56% (205-128) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 5 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Fuele vs G. Madarasz Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In recent times, Fuele has won 48.23% of points on their second serve, outperforming Madarasz who has secured 44.95%. Could this stat be crucial for predicting the match winner? Likely yes, given its strong correlation with match outcomes.
- Return Game Comparison: Fuele excelled in winning 49.4% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Madarasz's 45.7%. However, Madarasz shows a slight edge on first serve returns, clocking in at 32.26% versus Fuele’s 29.62%.
- Pressure Management: Madarasz has a higher breakpoint save percentage at 53.99%, whereas Fuele has managed 46.25%. This indicates Madarasz may handle pressure more effectively.
- Overall Performance: Over the last year, Fuele has a match win percentage of 61.11% with Madarasz close at 58.33%. A tight competition, but Fuele has a slight upper hand based on overall success.
- Surface Strengths: Fuele is strongest on Hard surfaces with a 66% win rate, whereas Madarasz prospers on Clay at 62%. Could surface type influence the match outcome significantly? Perhaps, since both have distinctive surface preferences.
- Competitive Experience: Both have played mostly Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with very similar success rates. This levels the playing field regarding experience.
- Direct Head-to-Head: Madarasz leads the head-to-head with a win in their previous encounter. Does this past victory lend Madarasz an edge? Potentially yes, given the psychological advantage.
- Pressure Situations: In extreme conditions like tiebreaks, Madarasz also leads with one win over Fuele's zero.
- Opponent Quality: Impressively, Fuele has played against higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 27.39 compared to Madarasz’s 388.69. Could stronger competition mean better preparedness for Fuele?
- Deciding Set Ability: Madarasz has a slight advantage in deciding sets, having won 50% compared to Fuele's 43% over the last year.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Madarasz has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities versus Fuele’s 35.09%, indicating a heightened ability to capitalize under pressure.
Editorial Prediction (August 26, 2025, UTC):
In the upcoming tennis match between Fuele and Madarasz, both players enter with comparable recent records and strengths. However, their distinct performance metrics provide insightful comparisons.
Fuele shows a slight edge in second serve performance and against higher-ranked opponents, hinting at potentially stronger match readiness. Meanwhile, Madarasz appears deft under pressure, outperforming Fuele in breakpoints saved and converted.
Surface preferences and past encounters could significantly impact this match. Madarasz's prior win in their head-to-head and impressive performance in tight situations may lend a psychological advantage.
Considering these factors, Madarasz is marginally tipped as the likely winner, given his edge in handling pressure and converting crucial opportunities. Nonetheless, Fuele's strengths should not be discounted, promising a competitive encounter.
Matyas Fuele vs Gergely Madarasz Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Fuele vs G. Madarasz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 21 | Games Won | 16 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:25:7 | Average Match Time | 1:25:7 |
| 63% (73/116) | 1st Serve % | 80% (86/107) |
| 73% (53/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (52/86) |
| 51% (22/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 42% (45/107) | Return Points Win % | 35% (41/116) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Fuele Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(10) 6-4 | ||
G. Madarasz Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
R2 | L | w/o | ||
R1 | L | 5-0 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
QF | L | 6-7(2) 6-2 ret. | ||

M. Fuele vs G. Madarasz Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.34% (144/87) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.56% (205/128) |
| 59.85% (316/212) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.45% (436/310) |
| 53.21% (2717/2389) | Games Win/Loss | 52.97% (3635/3227) |
| 68.33% (41/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 60.59% (103/67) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.04% (201/123) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 533 | Aces Total | 431 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 540 | Total Double Faults | 416 |
| 1:19:27 | Average Match Time | 1:10:50 |
| 410.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 478.38 |
| 61% (7473/12317) | 1st Serve % | 69% (10673/15394) |
| 66% (4924/7473) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (6821/10673) |
| 49% (2388/4843) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2425/4721) |
| 43% (572/1341) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (770/1664) |
| 42% (5155/12343) | Return Points Win % | 42% (6487/15439) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 62.72% (143/85) | Futures W/L | 62.93% (202/119) |
| 62% (142/228) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (201/322) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 61% (38/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (46/75) |
| 57% (39/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 68% (59/87) |
| 89% (140/124) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (190/173) |
| 11% (140/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (190/16) |
| 22% (91/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (143/30) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Fuele (M25 Luanda)
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

James Duckworth vs Rio Noguchi Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Christoph Negritu Prediction – ATP Temuco Challenger – 27th November 2025 Best Bets

Oleksandra Oliynykova vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 27th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Eva Vedder Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elena Malygina Prediction – WTA W75 Trnava – 26th November 2025 Best Bets
